<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Politics and The Quiet Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/news/social-politics-quiet-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/news/social-politics-quiet-revolution/</link>
	<description>…he still dreamed of cyberspace…bright lattices of logic unfolding across that colorless void…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thePuck</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/news/social-politics-quiet-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>thePuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/?p=170#comment-83</guid>
		<description>@Confusion

Who can tell the difference? And really, who cares? The main reason I chose it was because I didn&#039;t think it would turn the stomachs of my readers. The fact is the McCain side of the fence are not exactly &quot;with the times&quot; as far as social media go, and every attempt they make to do so just doesn&#039;t catch on. So I had to pick some example to match the Obama side, which is very social media savvy, and this is what I found.

The very fact that there is little to any recognizable difference between the satire and the real stuff should say something. Have you ever seen the forum board &quot;RaptureReady&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Confusion</p>
<p>Who can tell the difference? And really, who cares? The main reason I chose it was because I didn&#8217;t think it would turn the stomachs of my readers. The fact is the McCain side of the fence are not exactly &#8220;with the times&#8221; as far as social media go, and every attempt they make to do so just doesn&#8217;t catch on. So I had to pick some example to match the Obama side, which is very social media savvy, and this is what I found.</p>
<p>The very fact that there is little to any recognizable difference between the satire and the real stuff should say something. Have you ever seen the forum board &#8220;RaptureReady&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confusion</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/news/social-politics-quiet-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Confusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/?p=170#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll find that the clip from www.prayerhour.com is some form of straight-played humour.
I was unsure about it, until I looked at the merchandising page, and realised that THIS was there:
http://www.prayerhour.com/html/merchandise.html

Though maybe you meant to link to satire?  Didn&#039;t seem like it from context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find that the clip from <a href="http://www.prayerhour.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.prayerhour.com</a> is some form of straight-played humour.<br />
I was unsure about it, until I looked at the merchandising page, and realised that THIS was there:<br />
<a href="http://www.prayerhour.com/html/merchandise.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.prayerhour.com/html/merchandise.html</a></p>
<p>Though maybe you meant to link to satire?  Didn&#8217;t seem like it from context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Searles</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/news/social-politics-quiet-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Searles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 06:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/?p=170#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really get the feeling that big media gets this social media stuff enough to even.. well often what they say about it is a bit off the mark. I know that CNN&#039;s social media guidelines, for folks who work there.. is enough to make any self respecting social media type not want to work there... so I don&#039;t know really...

Though I do know that the local NPR radio station is actually kind of joining the community.. which is pretty cool.

I still think there&#039;s so few of us whom are really into this stuff.. that we probably think we are more important then we are.. even if we are the future... And even if we are fundamentally changing things. I think it&#039;s just that power structures and big business are not real great at the change management biz.. and business probably has to be radically re-conceptualized to ever get so it can really do stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really get the feeling that big media gets this social media stuff enough to even.. well often what they say about it is a bit off the mark. I know that CNN&#8217;s social media guidelines, for folks who work there.. is enough to make any self respecting social media type not want to work there&#8230; so I don&#8217;t know really&#8230;</p>
<p>Though I do know that the local NPR radio station is actually kind of joining the community.. which is pretty cool.</p>
<p>I still think there&#8217;s so few of us whom are really into this stuff.. that we probably think we are more important then we are.. even if we are the future&#8230; And even if we are fundamentally changing things. I think it&#8217;s just that power structures and big business are not real great at the change management biz.. and business probably has to be radically re-conceptualized to ever get so it can really do stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
