<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would this Project work better as a wiki&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/</link>
	<description>…he still dreamed of cyberspace…bright lattices of logic unfolding across that colorless void…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyT</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, no offence taken!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, no offence taken!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thePuck</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>thePuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t take it the wrong way! I mean harsh as in what you recommend is sharply different than what we have. Slight criticism= &quot;change color&quot;, moderate criticism= &quot;format change&quot;, harsh or severe criticism= &quot;change everything&quot;...you definitely said to change everything, from the domain name to the format to the content and methods of discussion. I do not mean harsh as in intended to cause offense or to be mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t take it the wrong way! I mean harsh as in what you recommend is sharply different than what we have. Slight criticism= &#8220;change color&#8221;, moderate criticism= &#8220;format change&#8221;, harsh or severe criticism= &#8220;change everything&#8221;&#8230;you definitely said to change everything, from the domain name to the format to the content and methods of discussion. I do not mean harsh as in intended to cause offense or to be mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyT</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>That wasn&#039;t harsh criticism, it was constructive critcism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That wasn&#8217;t harsh criticism, it was constructive critcism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thePuck</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>thePuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>WP MU and WP are merging codebases soon...I am thinking of adding all sorts of things then. The reason I ask is that I received some rather harsh criticism on our format recently, and while I could rebut some of it, I also want to take some parts seriously. A wiki might be a good idea...we had one, if you remember, back at the beginning, but no one used it. If I populated it rather than wrote the book (or a bit of both) and then went live with it, that might encourage more participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WP MU and WP are merging codebases soon&#8230;I am thinking of adding all sorts of things then. The reason I ask is that I received some rather harsh criticism on our format recently, and while I could rebut some of it, I also want to take some parts seriously. A wiki might be a good idea&#8230;we had one, if you remember, back at the beginning, but no one used it. If I populated it rather than wrote the book (or a bit of both) and then went live with it, that might encourage more participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timelady</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>timelady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaphilosophy.com/philosophy/would-this-project-work-better-as-a-wiki/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>What about Google Wave, or lots of plugins to allow for media, news articles, links etc, all relevant. Wave looks amazing for that, lots of fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Google Wave, or lots of plugins to allow for media, news articles, links etc, all relevant. Wave looks amazing for that, lots of fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
